<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EppsNet: Notes from the Golden Orange &#187; James Bach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eppsnet.com/tag/James-Bach/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eppsnet.com</link>
	<description>Online journal based in Orange County, CA. Hilarious anecdotes tempered by the icy chill of certain death.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>James Bach on Software Testing</title>
		<link>http://eppsnet.com/2008/01/james-bach-on-software-testing</link>
		<comments>http://eppsnet.com/2008/01/james-bach-on-software-testing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PE</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Orange County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[James Bach]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Weinberg]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eppsnet.com/2008/01/james-bach-on-software-testing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Jerry Weinberg has suggested that &#8220;it works&#8221; may mean &#8220;We haven&#8217;t tried very hard to make it fail, and we haven&#8217;t been running it very long or under very diverse conditions, but so far we haven&#8217;t seen any failures, though we haven&#8217;t been looking too closely, either.&#8221; In this pessimistic view, you have to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote class="quoted"><p>
Jerry Weinberg has suggested that &#8220;it works&#8221; may mean &#8220;We haven&#8217;t tried very hard to make it fail, and we haven&#8217;t been running it very long or under very diverse conditions, but so far we haven&#8217;t seen any failures, though we haven&#8217;t been looking too closely, either.&#8221; In this pessimistic view, you have to be on guard for people who say it works without checking even once to see if it could work.</p>
<div class="separator">&nbsp;</div>
<p>&#8220;No user would do that&#8221; really means &#8220;No user I can think of, who I like, would do that on purpose.&#8221;</p>
<p>Who aren&#8217;t you thinking of?</p>
<p>Who don&#8217;t you like who might really use this product? What might good users do by accident?</p>
<div class="separator">&nbsp;</div>
<p>In general it can vastly simplify testing if we focus on whether the product has a problem that matters, rather than whether the product merely satisfies all relevant standards. <span class="nowrap">. . .</span> Instead of thinking pass vs. fail, consider thinking problem vs. no problem.</p>
<div class="author">
&#8212; <a href="http://www.satisfice.com" rel="external">James Bach</a>
</div>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eppsnet.com/2008/01/james-bach-on-software-testing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
