<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EppsNet: Notes from the Golden Orange &#187; Lotus Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eppsnet.com/tag/Lotus-Notes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eppsnet.com</link>
	<description>Online journal based in Orange County, CA. Hilarious anecdotes tempered by the icy chill of certain death.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 20:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Best and Worst Software Features of the Week</title>
		<link>http://eppsnet.com/2008/02/best-and-worst-software-features-of-the-week</link>
		<comments>http://eppsnet.com/2008/02/best-and-worst-software-features-of-the-week#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PE</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Orange County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lotus Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Word]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software Design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eppsnet.com/2008/02/best-and-worst-software-features-of-the-week</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was typing in Microsoft Word and I started a bulleted list with an item like this: 

Topic1.  A sentence about Topic1.  And another one.

Then I hit the Enter key.  
What do you think happened? 
Not only did I get another bulleted list item, Word set the font to bold! 
So I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was typing in Microsoft Word and I started a bulleted list with an item like this: </p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Topic1.</strong>  A sentence about Topic1.  And another one.</li>
</ul>
<p>Then I hit the Enter key.  </p>
<p>What do you think happened? </p>
<p>Not only did I get another bulleted list item, Word set the font to bold! </p>
<p>So I typed this: </p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Topic2.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>And as soon as I typed the period, Word turned bold off!!  Not only did it figure out that I&#8217;m creating a bulleted list, it figured out that I&#8217;m starting each bullet with bold font, followed by a period, followed by more text in regular font, and it takes care of everything for me automatically!  That&#8217;s pretty sophisticated. </p>
<p>Compare that to <a href="http://eppsnet.com/2008/02/lotus-notes-sucks">Lotus Notes</a>, which can&#8217;t even figure out when I hit Enter twice that I want to turn the bullets <strong><em>off!</em></strong> </p>
<p>We use Notes at work and I swear to God, if I type a bulleted list and hit Enter twice, Notes gives me this:</p>
<ul>
<li>Item 1</li>
<li>Item 2</li>
<li>Item 3</li>
<li>&nbsp;</li>
<li>&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
<p>I actually have to turn bulleting off manually! Does anyone really <strong><em>want</em></strong> to create a bulleted list with multiple empty items? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never seen another text editor do something this <span class="nowrap">stupid . . .</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eppsnet.com/2008/02/best-and-worst-software-features-of-the-week/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lotus Notes Sucks</title>
		<link>http://eppsnet.com/2008/02/lotus-notes-sucks</link>
		<comments>http://eppsnet.com/2008/02/lotus-notes-sucks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>PE</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Orange County]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lotus Notes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software Design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eppsnet.com/2008/02/lotus-notes-sucks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m working with a company that uses Lotus Notes. It&#8217;s been more than 10 years since I&#8217;ve had to use Notes and it&#8217;s as bad as ever. It&#8217;s probably the worst piece of software ever released by a major company.
The worst feature &#8212; well, it&#8217;s hard to pick a worst feature, but one of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m working with a company that uses <a href="http://www-306.ibm.com/software/lotus/products/notes/" rel="external">Lotus Notes</a>. It&#8217;s been more than 10 years since I&#8217;ve had to use Notes and it&#8217;s as bad as ever. It&#8217;s probably <strong>the worst piece of software</strong> ever released by a major company.</p>
<p>The worst feature &#8212; well, it&#8217;s hard to pick a worst feature, but one of the worst features &#8212; because I have to deal with it dozens of times a day &#8212; is the way Notes makes me reply to email. I can&#8217;t just click Reply and start typing. When I click Reply, I get a dropdown list of options and have to select one:</p>
<blockquote class="smaller"><p>
- Reply<br />
- Reply with History<br />
- Reply without Attachment(s)<br />
- Reply with Internet-Style History
</p></blockquote>
<p>The godawful thing about this is that default options for email work 100 percent of the time. I <strong><em>always</em></strong> want to reply <strong><em>with</em></strong> history and <strong><em>without</em></strong> attachments, so why give me a bunch of options that I don&#8217;t want and make me explicitly select one every time? </p>
<p>Why would I <strong><em>not</em></strong> want to reply with history? If I&#8217;m sending replies without including the original email for context, most people send and get way too much email to remember what the heck I&#8217;m responding to.</p>
<p>And why would I send an attachment back to someone with my reply? They already <strong><em>have</em></strong> the document. They sent it to <strong><em>me</em></strong>. They don&#8217;t need another copy of it. But every day I see emails going back and forth across the network with multi-megabyte attachments because people have to explicitly select an option to remove it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eppsnet.com/2008/02/lotus-notes-sucks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
