Why Popular Music is Rubbish

 

Almost all the female singers have the same voice, like a half-mumbling toddler.

The male singers have a broader range but not a lot broader: the screamer, the effeminate and the high school dropout.

But the main problem is that whoever is writing the songs, it is just not their destiny to be songwriters. There’s a complete lack of imagination, resulting in only a few themes, endlessly recycled:

  • I love you
  • I love you and you love me
  • I love you and you don’t love me
  • I love you but you left
  • Let’s fuck

A Few More Reasons Teachers Don’t Want Parents to Know What Their Kids Are Doing at School

 

The Day the Delusions Died

 

The contradictions and moral bankruptcy of a worldview that spends years worrying about microaggressions and tone policing, but can’t decide what side it is on after the beheading of babies, aren’t exactly difficult to spot.

To put it another way: when Black Lives Matter organizations are lionizing Islamist terrorists by posting a paraglider logo, you’d be a fool not to reassess things.

Don’t Kill the Message

 

As a Democrat who has been left homeless, who is now definitely in the center but probably leaning increasingly right, I am left yet again with an appreciation, despite the messenger, of the message of the Trump administration because what those guys did was pretty incredible in hindsight.

So much of the work that happened in that administration turns out to have been right. And that’s what is so frustrating for me. The work on the border wall? We didn’t like the messenger, so we killed the message. Turned out it was right. Issuing long-term debt to refinance when rates were at zero? We didn’t like the messenger, so we killed the message. A structural peace in the Middle East? We didn’t like the messenger, so we killed the message. When are we gonna stop shooting ourselves in the foot? And when are we going to actually see and take the time to look past who is saying things and actually listen to them word for word?

Pharmacy Deserts — The Struggle is Real?

 
tree, desert, namibia
Photo by katja on Pixabay

Drugstore closures are leaving millions without easy access to a pharmacy

The nation’s largest drugstore chains — Rite Aid (which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last week), CVS and Walgreens plan to collectively close more than 1,500 stores.

Public health experts have already seen the fallout, noting that the first neighborhoods to lose their pharmacies are often predominantly Black, Latinx and low-income.

That sentence is written in a way that makes the world sound worse to the casual reader than it probably is.

How have public health experts “already seen the fallout” of something that hasn’t happened yet?

Predominantly Black, Latinx and low-income neighborhoods are “often” the first to lose pharmacies. Not always, but often. Ok, that makes sense. But it’s phrased in a way that sounds like the pharmacies are being closed because of the demographics.

If pharmacies didn’t want to be in predominantly Black, Latinx and low-income neighborhoods, it would be a lot cheaper to just not put pharmacies there in the first place, instead of building them, staffing them, operating them and then closing them down.

“According to our estimates, about one in four neighborhoods are pharmacy deserts across the country,” said Dima Qato, an associate professor at the University of Southern California who studies pharmacy access and health equity.

Again, the word “desert” makes life sound worse than it really is. In urban centers, a neighborhood is considered a pharmacy desert if residents are more than half a mile from the nearest drugstore.

Half a mile doesn’t sound burdensome to me. It’s not like living in rural Alaska. The nearest places for me to pick up prescriptions or buy groceries are about half a mile from where I live. I could walk to them in 10 minutes.

Here’s another solution: The large pharmacy chains will deliver prescriptions to you or send them by mail. Retail giants like Amazon and Walmart have pharmacy and medical treatment offerings, and will also provide delivery.

Are those reasonable solutions? I say yes. The story creates a problem that doesn’t really exist and focuses it on race and “vulnerable populations.” There are maybe two words in a fairly long story about a very important factor and that is crime.

Businesses closing in high-crime cities is not news anymore. Stop looting the Walgreens. Businesses can’t operate profitably if they’re being robbed 10 times a day and they will close.

You might say that people need to somehow provide for their basic needs, although in California, where I live, I notice a lot of the smash-and-grabs happen, not in drugstores, but in jewelry and upscale clothing stores.

Maybe some people’s basic needs include Rolex watches and Gucci belts. The struggle is the same.

Israel’s 9/11

 

Today should mark the end of the Biden administration’s dishonorable effort to reenter the Iran nuclear deal and its string of disgraceful and one-sided concessions to Hamas’s biggest backer.

Biden gave Iran access to frozen money, most recently $6 billion that had been frozen in South Korean banks. Since the administration came into office, it has been pouring money into Gaza aid projects knowing well that Iran’s client terrorist group, Hamas, is fully in control of the territory and would benefit from the help. In fact, Biden officials put in writing, in recently leaked documents, that they knew Hamas would benefit from the money they were sending. They sent it anyway.

True and False Statements About Trans People

 

Report: Trans People Seven Times More Likely Than Cisgender People to Experience Violence In California

An annual report detailing how many Californians were the victims of violence over the past year finds a slight dip in reported violence among most populations, but a sharp increase in reported violence against transgender people.

sfist.com (emphasis added)

Nothing I say here is intended to disparage trans people . . . I’m fine with adults doing what they want, dressing the way they want, acting the way they want, with a few minor restrictions — keep your hands to yourself, that sort of thing.

I don’t really care about trans people. But I take exception to being lied to by people advancing an agenda.

That said, the report mentioned in the article above is based on the fourth annual California Violence Experiences Survey, conducted by UC San Diego and Tulane University. If you look at it, you see that there was no “sharp increase in reported violence against transgender people” because previous surveys didn’t track responses for transgender people.

The article actually mentions that if you read all the way to the bottom:

It’s important to note that this was the first time that the UCSD/Tulane study tracked responses for non-binary and trans people.

So technically, it would not be accurate to say the study found that reports of violence against trans and non-binary people are “up,” because there is no data from the previous year for comparison.

“It’s important to note” that “technically, it would not be accurate …”

It wouldn’t be accurate “technically” or any other way. I’m not seeing the point of making an assertion in the lead paragraph that you know to be false and then following it up with an acknowledgement that the assertion is false.

As far as the claim in the headline, it’s an unlikely claim for which no plausible explanation is offered, so I’ll offer one. First, I have to share something I learned in Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman.

A study of new diagnoses of kidney cancer in the 3,141 counties of the United States reveals that the counties in which the incidence of kidney cancer are lowest are mostly rural, sparsely populated, and located in traditionally Republican states in the Midwest, the South and the West.

What do you make of this?

Now consider the counties in which the incidence of kidney cancer is highest. These counties tend to be mostly rural, sparsely populated, and located in traditionally Republican states in the Midwest, the South and the West.

The key factor is “sparsely populated.”

Most people know The Law of Large Numbers but there’s also a Law of Small Numbers, which says that small samples yield extreme results more often than large samples. Basically the Law of Large Numbers restated in reverse.

The survey sample was 98% cisgender and 2% transgender.

I don’t know if the Law of Small Numbers explains the claim in the headline, but since no other explanation was offered, I offered one.

It should be obvious to anyone paying attention that disproportionate violence toward trans people is a phony claim. Riley Gaines gives a talk at a college campus, after which she’s attacked by a trans mob and has to barricade herself in a room for her own safety. Matt Walsh has security personnel actually living in his house.

I’ve never seen or heard about Lia Thomas, for example, being physically attacked by anyone. Or Dylan Mulvaney. Or Caitlyn Jenner. They all move about freely while Riley Gaines needs police protection to appear in public. Almost every news item I see with an intersection of trans people and violence involves an angry trans mob, not a violent attack on a trans person.

The article concludes by saying “that a nationwide trend of violence against trans people is also impacting the state of California.”

The link, which is in the original article, goes to an article with the headline Report says at least 32 transgender people were killed in the U.S. in 2022.

Is 32 a lot? It doesn’t seem like a lot. Is there really “a nationwide trend of violence” against trans people? We’ve got to do some more math.

According to the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law, an estimated 1.4 million adults in the United States identify as transgender. This represents 0.6% of the adult U.S. population. So 32 murders among 0.6% of the adult population would project to 5,333 murders for 100% of the adult population.

That is nowhere close to the actual number. According to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports, there were 24,985 murders in the United States in 2022. Of these, 19,240 were murders of people aged 18 and over.

So no evidence of “a nationwide trend of violence.”

I would think that making assertions based on false statements and phony math would hurt you more than help you, but people are going to believe what they want to believe anyway. True statements about trans people are easily dismissed by calling people who make them hateful, transphobic, dangerous and far-right.

Secretive Transgender Policies in California Schools

 

California Attorney General Rob Bonta has defied a court order by directing school districts to adopt policies that allow them to hide a student’s claimed transgender identity from parents or guardians, despite a federal judge’s ruling that such policies likely violate the U.S. Constitution, lawyers say.

Bonta sent a letter to school districts across California, encouraging them to adopt secretive transgender policies.

When my son was younger, my hottest hot button was “Do not fuck around with my kid.” Now that my son is an adult, I don’t know if I have a hottest hot button, but one of my hottest hot buttons is “Don’t fuck around with other people’s kids.”

I absolutely believe in the right of parents to direct the education, health and upbringing, and to maintain the well-being of, their children.

Do I think a lot of parents do a poor job of that? Yes. But I still believe in their right to do it.

One of the reasons that’s sometimes cited for not informing parents of a student’s transgender identity is a right of privacy.

Children don’t have a right of privacy from their parents. I learned when my son was an adult and went to college that his consent (which he granted) was required for his mom or me to access his health records, grades — anything, really. It seems obvious enough to me that a school does not have the right to withhold health records, grades or anything else regarding a minor child, and I’m including gender dysphoria as a health issue.

Another reason often given for not informing parents is “safety.” “Safety” has become synonymous with “whatever I want to do.” Similarly, whatever I don’t want to do is “dangerous,” as in “Forced outing [another great term] of children to their parents could be dangerous.”

I have to call total bullshit on that one, as school personnel in California are mandated reporters, meaning if they suspect a student is living in a dangerous situation, they’re required to report that to the appropriate agency and it has nothing to do with gender identity.

Finally, and most importantly, secretive transgender policies seem to me to check all the boxes for grooming:

  • Gaining access and isolating the victim: Abusers will attempt to physically or emotionally separate a victim from those protecting them (e.g., drive a wedge between students and parents) and often seek out positions in which they have contact with minors.
  • Trust development and keeping secrets: Abusers attempt to gain trust of a potential victim through sharing “secrets” and other means to make them feel that they have a caring relationship and to train them to keep the relationship secret.
  • Desensitization to discussion of sexual topics: Abusers may show the victim pornography (the school library probably has some) or discuss sexual topics with them, to introduce the idea of sexual contact.

Next step: Blackmail the child. It would be bad for you if our little secret got out, wouldn’t it?

You might say, “How dare you suggest that a teacher would do something like that?” Well — the teacher is already a self-professed liar. If teachers are willing to lie to parents, why wouldn’t they lie to students? A liar is a liar.

Also, on any given day in our great land, you can find a teacher being arrested for sexual contact with a student. It’s not even surprising anymore. Granted, these seem to mostly be heterosexual relationships but there’s no reason why that has to be the case.

If you’re a parent, make your own choices, but if I still had a school-age child, I would get him the hell out of any school that was committed to secretive transgender policies.

Obstructing Congressional Proceedings

 

He’s got a fair point there because the statute regarding “obstructing congressional proceedings” is what a lot of J6ers are charged with. It carries a maximum sentence, I believe, of 20 years in prison, which allows lengthy sentences to be doled out to people who entered a building and walked around.

Yes, you entered a building and walked around but we were trying to conduct a congressional proceeding and you obstructed it.

And in the words of Bob Dylan,

To show that all’s equal and that the courts are on the level
And that the strings in the books ain’t pulled and persuaded
And that even the nobles get properly handled
Once that the cops have chased after and caught ’em
And that the ladder of law has no top and no bottom,

I’d like to see Rep. Bowman face the same charge.

My Boyhood Sports Icons Are Dying: Brooks Robinson

 

Brooks Robinson

Hall of Fame third baseman Brooks Robinson, the “Human Vacuum Cleaner,” has died at the age of 86.

Robinson played his entire 23-year career with the Orioles. He was selected to 18 All-Star Games and earned the 1964 AL Most Valuable Player award after batting .318 with 28 home runs and a league-leading 118 RBIs. He won 16 consecutive Gold Gloves. He was the best-fielding third basemen I’ve ever seen.

Robinson’s most memorable performance came as MVP of the 1970 World Series, a five-game triumph over the Reds, He hit .429, homered twice and drove in six runs.

In Game 1, Robinson delivered the tiebreaking home run in the seventh inning. One inning earlier, he made a sensational backhanded grab of a hard grounder hit down the line by Lee May, spun around in foul territory and somehow threw out the runner.

Robinson contributed an RBI single in the second game and became forever a part of World Series lore with his standout performance in Game 3. He made a tremendous, leaping grab of a grounder by Tony Perez to start a first-inning double play; charged a slow roller in the second inning and threw out Tommy Helms; then capped his memorable afternoon with a diving catch of a liner by Johnny Bench.

“I’m beginning to see Brooks in my sleep,” Reds manager Sparky Anderson said during the Series. “If I dropped this paper plate, he’d pick it up on one hop and throw me out at first.”

Robinson was elected into the Hall of Fame on the first ballot in 1983. In 1999, he was named to baseball’s All-Century team, which honored the best 25 players of the 20th century.

RIP Brooks Robinson

Clapping for Nazis

 

Canadian standing ovation for Nazi

The photo shows Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and other members of the Canadian Parliament giving a standing ovation for Yaroslav Hunka, a Ukrainian World War II veteran who later immigrated to Canada.

Let me put this in hockey parlance so the Canadians can understand it. This is what’s known as an “own goal.”

It’s hard to figure out how this happened, because Hunka’s introduction included the fact that he fought against Russia in WWII. Did no one think “Why was he fighting Russia? Russia was on our side.”

It turns out that he was fighting Russia because he was in the Waffen-SS, i.e., he is (or was, at least) a Nazi.

House Speaker Anthony Rota, who invited and introduced Hunka, has since resigned, and Trudeau has issued an on-brand non-apology apology.

I haven’t heard that Zelenskyy said anything, but if he did, it was probably along the lines of “Sorry for making you all give a standing ovation to a Ukrainian Nazi but in Ukraine it’s actually a pretty common event.”

A Mystery of the Digital Censorship Era

 

A mystery of the digital censorship era is the ease with which its core ideas have been sold to people who were its fiercest initial opponents. The closer you look at mechanisms now used to isolate, remove, disrupt, and spy on everyone from environmentalists to antiwar activists to anti-mandate or anti-lockdown protesters, the more easily you’ll see a direct line to high-profile civil liberties controversies of two decades ago. The modern Internet surveillance state was born in programs bitterly opposed then by left-leaning intellectuals, of the type who subscribed to The Nation and carried NO BLOOD FOR OIL signs while protesting war in Iraq.

— Matt Taibbi

Failing To Notify Parents When Their Child Changes Gender Is ‘The American Way’?

 

Dem Governor: Failing To Notify Parents When Their Child Changes Gender Is ‘The American Way’freebeacon.com

The Democratic governor is Phil Murphy from New Jersey, who says that “outing” LGBTQ students to their parents is a violation of the child’s constitutional rights. Thus, opposing parental notification is “the American way.”

“Listen, we took these actions because it’s the right thing to do,” Murphy said. “Let’s protect the rights of these precious kids. Let’s do things the right way, the American way.”

I wasn’t even aware that constitutional rights apply to children. Without researching it, I suspect they don’t.

I also don’t think that children have the cognitive maturity to make decisions on their own about sexuality and gender identity. Transgenderism, for example, is a mental disorder: gender dysphoria. It’s a diagnosis obtained via medical care and therapy, not obtained via the internet. There almost certainly is not someone at a school qualified to make such a diagnosis.

It gets worse. Murphy’s attorney general, Matt Platkin, says parental notification policies pose “serious mental health risks” and threaten “physical harm to students.”

You send your kid to school and not only are totally unqualified people taking him or her on gender journeys, they’re telling your kids that you are dangerous and violent, and therefore teachers and students must team up to lie to you.

Can anyone explain how this guy gets one single vote from a parent in the entire state of New Jersey?