An Alternative Approach to Student Loan Relief

 

I knew Biden wasn’t allowed to do this.

Here’s the good news. You can just flip those signs over, write a new begging message on the back, and go stand on a freeway offramp.

Student loan protestors

Supreme Court Kills Affirmative Action

 

The Supreme Court Has Killed Affirmative Action. Mediocre Whites Can Rest Easier. — thenation.com

The author of that piece really hates white people. I don’t recommend reading it, you will not be a better person for having done so, as it consists solely of sweeping generalizations, broad judgments, unfounded inferences and racial insults.

Even if five points (out of a possible 100) were deducted for each verifiable fact, it still scores at least a 95. Grammar and spelling are passable.

The only “fact” I remember being cited in support of affirmative action is actually false:

In California, which ended its affirmative action policies over 25 years ago, the studies show that, without affirmative action, Black enrollment plummets, Latino enrollment plummets, AAPI enrollment goes up a little bit, and whites flood the remaining opportunities.

The article that the author links to doesn’t even say that. Black and Latino enrollment in the UC system has gone up, not down. A snippet from that article:

Black and Latino students increased to 43% of the admitted first-year class of Californians for fall 2022 compared with about 20% before Proposition 209.

(Proposition 209 is the law that ended affirmative action.)

What did happen after Prop 209 was a significant redistribution of black and Latino students. Their enrollment at the most elite UC schools, Berkeley and UCLA, dropped — by a lot — but went up at the other UC campuses.

After this redistribution, there was an increase in the number of black and Latino students graduating, including an increase of 55% in the number graduating in four years, an increase of 63% in the number graduating in four years with a grade point average of 3.5 or higher, an increase of nearly 50% in the number graduating with degrees in science, mathematics, and engineering, and an increase of about 20% in the number of earned doctorates.

Everybody talks about admission, no one talks about graduation. If you’re admitted to an elite school as a diversity admit, rather than because you’re academically capable of being there, your chances of graduating are not great.

That’s what was happening in California. Students who could have done well at another UC school were being affirmative-actioned into Berkeley and UCLA and never graduated.

 

Affirmative action supporters should be asked straight up why they don’t believe black Americans have the capability to overcome obstacles that other marginalized groups (Asians, Jews) have overcome. It amounts to the same thing.

Racism isn’t dead but it’s not stopping people from doing anything they want to do. We elected a black president (twice), so what is there that a black person can’t accomplish because of their race? (No Asian or Jewish presidents, FYI.)

Speaking of which, Obama and all the other affirmative action hucksters, despite many of them being black and having accomplished notable things in life, are permanently damaging the black race by telling kids, “People don’t like you because your skin is too dark. They don’t want you to succeed. You will not be treated fairly in life and your efforts will not be rewarded.”

What will happen to kids raised that way? They will fail. It’s child abuse. You want to raise kids to believe in themselves and their power to accomplish what they set out to do.

But kids can’t vote. If you preach the same message to black adults, i.e., that your failures in life are not of your own making, that you are not as well off as you should be because of white supremacy and structural racism and systemic racism and unconscious racism and all kinds of racism, they will give you money and votes and power, if that’s what you want, but again, at the expense of destroying your own race.

Thomas Sowell said this in 1964 and I think he was right (as usual):

To me the psychology of blacks is the single biggest obstacle to racial progress. It isn’t fashionable to say this, and it certainly isn’t pleasant, but truth does not depend on these considerations. With all due respect to the courage and dedication of the various civil rights groups, I think that when all the laws have been passed and all the gates flung open, the net result will be one tremendous anticlimax unless there is a drastic change of attitude among blacks.

Diversity at Harvard

 

The Harvard University president, vice president, provost, and 15 deans signed an email reaffirming the institution’s commitment to diversity after the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action on Thursday.

The Supreme Court ruled that the race-conscious admissions policies practiced by Harvard University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

The email states that “diversity and difference are essential to academic excellence” and “to prepare leaders for a complex world, Harvard must admit and educate a student body whose members reflect, and have lived, multiple facets of human experience.”

Whatever that means. But what does race have to do with it? Why is race the deciding factor?

I think it would be easy to find a young black person and a young white person who’ve lived very similar lives. Or to find two young white people who’ve led very different lives. Or two young black people who’ve led very different lives. You agree?

And on the subject of “diversity,” I’d say Harvard has a very narrow definition. In 2023, the Harvard Crimson annual survey of Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences found that more than 77 percent of surveyed faculty identified as either “very liberal” or “liberal,” while 2.5 percent identified as “conservative” and less than 1 percent as “very conservative.”

Diversity = people of many different colors who all think exactly alike.

If Your House Burns Down and You Rebuild It, Did You “Create” a New House?

 

I love these Biden tweets on job “creation.”

ChatGPT tells me that the COVID-19 pandemic caused the loss of more than 22 million jobs in the United States. The 13 million jobs that Biden “created” are those lost jobs coming back. But he’s still 9 million short. What happened to those people?

The unemployment rate is low, which suggests that people have left the labor force for some reason. If COVID didn’t kill them all, then they may have retired, given up (not everyone wants to work at fast-food restaurants), or cobbled together a welfare package they can live on.

The labor force participation rate (shown below) has never come back to pre-pandemic level, and people who have left the labor force are not counted in the unemployment rate.

Billionaires

 

Reading Joe Biden’s Twitter is exquisitely painful, like a sore tooth that you can’t stop pushing on with your tongue.

How do these things even go together? Americans are not taxed on their net worth, they’re taxed on their income. At least that’s what I think he’s talking about. Income tax. Although there are a lot of other federal taxes: self-employment tax, gift tax, excise taxes, etc.

Is he talking about taxing people’s net worth? I don’t know. I can’t figure it out.

I’m not a billionaire myself because I don’t know how to make that happen. If someone has figured out how to do it, good for them. They’re entitled to what they have.

Climate and Environmental Justice for Ignorant Bigots

 

“Climate and environmental justice”? What is that and how much does it cost?

Are we being atmospherically sodomized by ignorant climate change deniers?

Doing What He Loved

 

Jim Tweto, the patriarch of a family aviation business in Alaska whose fame endured a decade after his somewhat reluctant star turn on television, died June 16 when the Cessna 180 he was flying failed to gain altitude after takeoff. — aopa.org

“At least he died doing what he loved.”

“He loved crashing planes?”

Censorship is Not “Misinformation”

 

Vaccine misinformation has nothing to do with it. “Misinformation” is a meaningless but useful term because no one wants to just come out and say “We love censorship and we are silencing the views of anyone we disagree with.”

Instead, under the guise of “misinformation,” they can say that certain content cannot be allowed, in the interest of safety and the Common Good.

Google, which owns YouTube, donates vast sums of money to the Democratic party, and they are not going to have RFK Jr. clips on YouTube because if they do, people might decide to vote for him.

The Democratic party doesn’t like voting, they don’t like elections, what they like is to just choose presidential nominees themselves. You may have noticed that in the last two election cycles.

The Kennedy-Peterson interview is still available on Twitter.

The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God. — Deuteronomy 22:5

Far-Right ‘Moms for Liberty’ is a Hate Group?

 

Moms for Liberty, the far-right parental group known for protesting at school board meetings, has been identified by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a “hate group” for the first time ever. — msn.com

“Far-right” is an empty phrase assigned to, as far as I can tell, people who do not subscribe to neoliberal orthodoxy and who question U.S. institutions of power, like government and teachers unions.

And the lead paragraph, quoted above, indicates that “protesting at school board meetings,” which is actually a right protected by the Constitution of the United States, will earn you an SPLC designation as a “hate group.”

The SPLC also labeled 11 other “right-wing ‘parents’ rights'” groups as extremist groups.

The use of quotes in the story is noteworthy. The author has scare-quoted “parents’ rights” and labeled the parents’ rights groups en masse as right-wing, as though the idea that parents have rights is some kind of a fringe concept that most people reject.

“Hate group” is also scare-quoted, as though it doesn’t have any real meaning (it doesn’t) but in this particular case seems to mean a group that does not believe, as the SPLC obviously does, that the opinions of the government, teachers unions and school boards regarding racial politics and gender ideology are so obviously correct and so profoundly enlightened that only hate or bigotry can explain others’ holding different beliefs.

The Department of Justice issued a memo in 2021 urging the investigation of concerned parents, backtracked on it, but did not respond to a request for comment regarding ties between the administration and the SPLC.

Definitions of “Woke”

 

A “woke” person, or “social-justice warrior,” is someone who believes that (1) the institutions of American society are currently and intentionally set up to oppress (minorities, women, the poor, fat people, etc.), (2) virtually all gaps in performance between large groups prove that this oppression exists, and (3) the solution to this is equity — which means proportional representation regardless of performance or qualifications.

 

The attitude of a person who regards his or her opinions as so obviously correct and so profoundly enlightened that they may not legitimately be doubted or challenged, and that only hate or bigotry can explain others’ holding different beliefs.

 

At an American university, a conductor rehearsing a chorus said, “Now, ladies and gentlemen, please turn to Section B,” or whatever. A student reported him to administration. Administration gave him a warning. . . .

My colleague David Mastio worked at USA Today for a long while. At some point, a group of activists at the paper decided that “pregnant women” would no longer do. It had to be “pregnant people.” Mastio observed that the “people” in “pregnant people” are also known as “women.” The activists demanded that he be fired. Instead, he was demoted.

Book Banning

 

Biden administration to appoint anti-book ban coordinator as part of new LGBTQ protections — cbsnews.com

Oh, I’ve got the perfect candidate! This guy:

Sam Brinton

Seriously though, what does LGBTQ have to do with book banning? Book banning has a long history completely unrelated to LGBTQ, and the book banning that is attributed to LGBTQ seems to be either fake or due to the age-inappropriateness of the material.

DOJ to Work ‘Hand-in-Hand’ With LGBTQ Community To Address ‘Threats’

 

That’s a good idea because crazy trans hoes in the LGBTQ “community” are the most violent people I’ve ever seen. Riley Gaines doesn’t seem to be able to go out in public without police protection. Matt Walsh has security personnel living in his house.

High school girls have been beaten and raped by trans-identifying boys in high school bathrooms.

Here’s a nice sign that some trans activists brought to a women’s rally in London:

Arm Trans Kids

In keeping with the tradition of other violent, lunatic fringe organizations, members of the trans group wore masks over their faces, but from photos in the article, they all seem to be male.

I sense a strong aroma of three things:

  1. Misogyny
  2. Child endangerment
  3. Sexual gratification of deviant males

I don’t see violence directed at LGBTQ people. America loves gay people. Many trans people are harder to like because they’re too angry and violent and delusional but still, I’ve never heard of anyone attacking Lia Thomas or Dylan Mulvaney or Caitlyn Jenner or that cross-dressing admiral or the nuclear waste guy who steals women’s luggage.

I hope the DOJ can tamp down the LGBTQ violence.

Cats and Puppies

 

Pregnant Transgender Man Gets Backlash Over Glamour UK Pride Issue: “I’m A Pregnant Man, And I’m Trans” — msn.com

Pregnant man?

He’s going to have a hard time pushing the baby out his dick. Is an OB/GYN involved in the process? Why would a man go to an OB/GYN?

“My dog identifies as a cat. You know what that means?”

“No, what?”

“A cat can have puppies.”

It’s just a silly word game . . .

Abraham Lincoln used to ask “How many legs does a dog have if you call a tail a leg?”

The answer is four. As Abe would point out, calling a tail a leg doesn’t make it a leg.

And calling a woman a man doesn’t make her a man.

Have you built your ship of death, or have you?
Oh build your ship of death, for you will need it.
— D.H. Lawrence, “The Ship of Death”

Gay Woman Talks About Pride Marketing Campaigns

 

From Tammy Bruce, a gay TV and radio person:

I realize that there’s all kinds of different people in the world. Lord knows I live a marginal life myself and I like my life. But what this [i.e., pride commercials and marketing campaigns] does is it sends a message it’s really kind of an extremist framework.

[Pride is] really about being left alone but being treated equally and fairly . . . it’s as though there has to be another step forward, another kind of push for something, for everyone to be a victim or for some kind of new dynamic.

Those kinds of ads really do damage to the gay and lesbian community. Because it’s pandering, it’s extreme… It does not respect the audience in a sense.

[Companies are] not used to how Americans are usually quiet and that while we might not be having riots and marches, that we’re gonna speak with the dollar, especially when the economy is tight. That we’re going to be very careful about where we spend money.

And it’s not about homophobia, it’s about everything being politicized. Having messages, political messages of any type, being pushed onto us. None of us want that, no matter what your sexual orientation or your race or your background.

TIL About Hormone Therapy

 

red and yellow plastic toy blocks

The following information is from the St. Louis Children’s Hospital Hormone Therapy web page.

Children’s hospital.

There are two types of hormone therapy (obviously): feminizing hormone therapy and masculinizing hormone therapy.

Feminizing hormone therapy

This means giving estrogen and possibly androgen blockers to people “assigned male at birth.” (That is a phrase I don’t like. People “assigned male at birth” are male and will be male their entire lives no matter what. Do a DNA test if you have any doubt about it.)

Here are the changes you can expect from feminizing hormone therapy:

  • Body fat redistribution
  • Breast growth
  • Decreased muscle mass and strength
  • Decreased libido
  • Decreased penile function
  • Decreased testicular volume
  • Decreased sperm production
  • Slowed growth of body and facial hair
  • Softening of skin

To maintain these changes, you need to keep taking hormone therapy for the rest of your life.

Masculinizing hormone therapy

This involves giving testosterone to people “assigned female at birth.” Expected changes include:

  • Body fat redistribution
  • Clitoral enlargement
  • Deepened voice
  • Facial and body hair growth
  • Increased muscle mass and strength
  • Increased skin oiliness
  • No more periods
  • Vaginal atrophy

As with feminizing hormone therapy, to maintain the changes, you need to keep taking hormone therapy for the rest of your life.

 

According to the web page, people who benefit most from hormone therapy usually have:

  • Persistent, well-documented gender dysphoria or gender incongruence
  • The capacity to make a fully informed decision and consent to treatment
  • Good, or well-controlled, emotional health

Those seem mutually inconsistent, given that “gender dysphoria” is recognized by the American Psychiatric Association as a mental disorder.

The Mayo Clinic says that the gender dysphoria diagnosis “was created to help people with gender dysphoria get access to necessary health care and effective treatment.” This seems to imply that gender dysphoria is not really a pathology, it’s just a “diagnosis” created to allow people to bill treatments to their health insurance. But if it’s “just a diagnosis” and not a pathology, why are people’s breasts and genitals being amputated? That seems a bit extreme.

Side effects

Possible side effects of feminizing hormone therapy include

  • Blood clots
  • Gallstones
  • Headaches or migraines
  • Heightened risk of diabetes and heart disease
  • Nausea or vomiting

I’ve had gallstones. They’re excruciatingly painful. Headaches and vomiting I could live with short term, but I wouldn’t want to have them going on all the time. The other three I don’t want at all.

Possible side effects of masculinizing hormone therapy include

  • Headaches or migraines
  • Higher risk of heart attack, heart disease and stroke
  • Weight gain

Not so bad. Except the second one. The second one looks pretty bad.

And of course because research in this area is just beginning, it’s possible that there are other long-term risks we don’t know about yet.

According to the web page, “current guidelines suggest that around 16 years of age is a good time to start hormone therapy.”

I love that sentence, I think because it’s so offhand and mundane. It sounds like “Guidelines suggest that X years of age is a good time to start piano lessons.”

Reject the Evidence of Your Eyes and Ears

 

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

— George Orwell, 1984

Joe Biden has said that the American economy is “stronger than hell.” In other news, the percentage of non-retired Americans who expect to have enough money to retire comfortably is now at 43 percent, an 11-year low.