Profile icons don’t count.
![]()
I've never seen one, you incoherent mumbling toad. https://t.co/uFeTvy5o1p
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) February 21, 2023
Profile icons don’t count.
![]()
I've never seen one, you incoherent mumbling toad. https://t.co/uFeTvy5o1p
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) February 21, 2023
I think every kid, in every zip code, in every state should have access to every education opportunity possible.
I guess, for some, that isn’t the consensus view. https://t.co/d1FAeWwKv1
— President Biden (@POTUS) February 17, 2023
That is a load of malarkey! I mean, the bullshit meter just totally pegged.
That is not what he thinks and anyone who knows even a little about politics knows that is not what he thinks.
What he thinks is that every kid in every zip code should attend the public schools that they’re assigned to based on where they live. And if those schools are hopeless trash fires, the kids should attend those schools anyway.
Teachers unions and the Democratic party are co-dependent. The unions, in addition to providing financial support, are the foot soldiers of the party. In exchange, no Democrat will ever — and I mean never ever — support school choice, i.e., every kid having access to every education opportunity possible.
P.S. Whoever wrote this tweet is definitely a graduate of the public schools Biden thinks every kid should attend. Shouldn’t the phrase “education opportunity” be “educational opportunity”? “Education” is a noun, not an adjective.
Now try to figure out the last sentence. How can one person have a consensus view?
BREAKING
Spokesperson for Hell disputes Biden’s claim that the U.S. economy is “strong as hell”
Quote: “Data shows Hell’s economy is currently much stronger than America’s” pic.twitter.com/czwnQAMGCn
— News That Matters (@ThatmattersNews) October 17, 2022
According to LinkedIn, here are some of the companies doing layoffs so far in February:
Clapper says letter about Russian links to Hunter Biden laptop saga was 'distorted' https://t.co/DFdQGXXS7f
— Paul Epps (@paulepps) February 17, 2023
Wow! It took him more than two years to figure that out?!
“All we were doing was raising a yellow flag that this could be Russian disinformation. Politico deliberately distorted what we said,” Clapper recently told the Washington Post.
“The intent of the letter was that this could be Russian disinformation — emphasis on could,” Clapper told the outlet. “It’s a very important nuance … a distinction that people are always ignoring.”
Well, he’s right. If you read the letter carefully, it does say — I’m paraphrasing here — we have no idea if the laptop is Russian disinformation, we have no evidence that it is, but it does have the classic earmarks of Russian spycraft.
Why would 50 former high-ranking intel officials get together to write and sign a letter saying, basically, we have no idea what we’re talking about? Answer: because they knew it would be distorted. They wanted it to be distorted.
Intel guys — FBI, CIA, DHS — didn’t and don’t like Donald Trump, didn’t want him re-elected because he treats them with the contempt they deserve.
Journalists are a) left-leaning, and b) not too smart, but just to be sure it gets distorted, let’s put the letter in the hands of Natasha Bertrand (then at Politico), one of the biggest liars in the profession.
Then after the election, when a suitable amount of time has passed, like maybe two years from now, we can — correctly! — say that our words were distorted.

I read yesterday that Moses Hall became the fifth building at UC Berkeley to lose its name( because of the allegedly racist views of its namesake, Bernard Moses, a prominent faculty member from 1875 to 1911.
All of the buildings have been unnamed since 2020.
“Disappearing” people is straight out of the Joseph Stalin playbook and I’ve never learned to see Stalin as a role model.
According to the Berkeley news article that I read, Niko Kolodny, former chair of the philosophy department, said he became aware via email that Moses’ name “had been deeply disturbing to several people of color.”
The University of California established a Bernard Moses Memorial Lecture in 1937, and Moses Hall was named in 1965. The fact that it took more than 80 years since Moses was first recognized for the university to familiarize itself with his views (via an email!) and deem them inappropriate suggests that virtually no one has been reading his writings for the past 80 years, thus the number of people (“several”) who might have been deeply disturbed would have to be quite small.
What I find deeply disturbing is that anyone with — or without, but especially with — the benefit of a so-called liberal education would be deeply disturbed to find that people living 100 years ago held views that would not be considered progressive by 2023 standards.
In fact, academics writing in any discipline 100 years ago or more would have espoused views and theories that are now considered obsolete. Why would that surprise or disturb anyone? I don’t think Berkeley should be proud of graduating students who become deeply disturbed by something so obvious.
The Moses unnaming proposal states that while Moses’ perspective might have been common among white academics at the time he expressed it, “it is at odds with the present values of the UC Berkeley community.”
So Moses was not an outlier. His perspective was common at the time he expressed it. The article doesn’t even say that his work has since been shown to be empirically false, only that “it is at odds with the present values of the UC Berkeley community.”
Can something be true and at the same time “at odds with the present values of the UC Berkeley community”? If so, which takes precedence?
And finally, given that Berkeley seems to be on a run of unnaming buildings, and that the campus sits on unceded (i.e., stolen) Indian land, I’d like to pose the following to every grinning nitwit involved in the unnaming, up to and including the Chancellor: “Do you feel morally justified in using and benefitting from the occupation of stolen Indian land, while making holier-than-thou pronouncements about people who’ve been dead for 100 years? Shouldn’t the entire campus be bulldozed and the land returned to its rightful owners?”
Lock up your libraries if you like; but there is no gate, no lock, no bolt that you can set upon the freedom of my mind. — Virginia Woolf
The problem with education today is too much emphasis on academics and not enough emphasis on transitioning 13-year-old girls into boys without telling the parents.
Hey Gavin, my daughter Alaina was killed at Parkland and I support permit-less carry in Florida. If my daughter were alive she’d be carrying, because she would be defenseless in a gun free zone.
Sit this one out. https://t.co/htDcUnVK73
— Ryan Petty (@rpetty) February 1, 2023
Mr. Petty went on to make some cogent points in a subsequent interview:
“California has suffered some horrific tragedies over the last couple weeks in mass shootings and gun control advocates promise that if we just implement their preferred policies, we’ll be safer as a nation.
“California has enacted what you could only call ‘the dream’ for gun-control advocates, and it is not proving to make Californians any safer. The reason is simple.
“Criminals don’t obey gun laws.
“The only thing Gavin Newsom and the California legislature have accomplished is curtailing the rights of law-abiding Californians, and in doing so they have made no one safer.
“I think Californians should just lift their heads up and realize that what they’re doing isn’t making them any safer. You can’t perpetually be just one more gun law away from public safety and that’s, unfortunately, what the gun control advocates are peddling.”
Shell recorded a record profit in 2022 of $40,000,000,000.
That’s 40 billion. That’s double their $20,000,000,000 in 2021. Aren’t you happy for them? Because your life is great too.— Phil Hendrie (@realphilhendrie) February 2, 2023
How much should they make? Apple made $120 billion selling gadgets. Shell sells a product people need.

Pritzker Demands Black Queer History in AP African-American Studies — nationalreview.com
In case you don’t know who “Pritzker” is, which I didn’t, J.B. Pritzker is the governor of Illinois.

The College Board is putting together a new AP African-American Studies (APAAS) course. Florida governor Ron DeSantis, whom you probably do know, recently rejected the APAAS course, said he would not allow it to be taught in Florida, because the curriculum includes topics that seem to be included for political purposes rather than their relevance to African-American studies.
Like “queer history.”
I’m not aware of any state ever previously vetoing an AP course. Pritzker sent a letter to the College Board in which he attacked what he called “Florida’s racist and homophobic laws” and pledged that Illinois would “reject any curriculum modifications designed to appease extremists like the Florida Governor and his allies.”
I don’t think until fairly recently, it would have occurred to J.B. Pritzker to demand that queer history be included in an AP curriculum.
Here’s a full list of AP courses:
It seems like if you think queer history is an essential component in an AP course, you could demand its inclusion in all of these courses.
There are queer people in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain. There have been queer artists, biologists, computer scientists, musicians, politicians. I could go on and on.
Why does J.B. Pritzker think that queer history is an essential component of one and only one AP course? I would like to ask him that. Or see a reporter ask him that. Reporters rarely ask interesting or provocative questions unfortunately.
I’d like to ask him where he would rank his own knowledge of Black queer history on a scale of 0 to 10. I’d like to know how is it possible that anyone in America is leading a productive life in the absence of a dedicated study of Black queer history.
Spoiler Alert: It appears that the final version of the APAAS course will be closer to the DeSantis vision than the Pritzker vision, although the linked article sounds disingenuous to me.
As I write this, YouTube has taken down the video, I assume because it shows a Pfizer employee acting like an out-of-control cartoon character and damages the vaccine narrative.
The video is still up on Twitter.
WATCH: Pfizer Official ‘Physically Assaults’ James O’Keefe, ‘Destroys iPad Showing Undercover Recordings’ https://t.co/OviQpYh2Ol
— Paul Epps (@paulepps) January 28, 2023
From the New York Times:
Diversity trainings have been around for decades, long before the country’s latest round of racial reckoning. But after George Floyd’s murder — as companies faced pressure to demonstrate a commitment to racial justice — interest in the diversity, equity and inclusion (D.E.I.) industry exploded. The American market reached an estimated $3.4 billion in 2020.
Though diversity trainings have been around in one form or another since at least the 1960s, few of them are ever subjected to rigorous evaluation, and those that are mostly appear to have little or no positive long-term effects. The lack of evidence is “disappointing,” wrote Elizabeth Levy Paluck of Princeton and her co-authors in a 2021 Annual Review of Psychology article, “considering the frequency with which calls for diversity training emerge in the wake of widely publicized instances of discriminatory conduct.”
But there’s a darker possibility: Some diversity initiatives might actually worsen the D.E.I. climates of the organizations that pay for them.
I can’t remember ever having any doubt about this.
There’s a model for marginalized groups (Asians, Jews) being successful in America and the model doesn’t include a focus on other people being responsible for everything that’s wrong with your life.
California teacher helps change students’ gender identity without parents knowing — torontosun.com
The biggest problem in education is too much emphasis on academics and not enough emphasis on teachers changing students’ gender identity without parents knowing.

Gavin Newsom swats down CBS reporter’s Second Amendment question — msn.com
That’s not really the way I saw it. Gavin Newsom is not a smart man. He’s not going to win too many forensic scrimmages against another adult.
The reason the CBS reporter was talking to Newsom about guns and the Second Amendment is that we had 3 mass shootings in 3 days in California. I’ve heard that California has the strictest gun control laws of any state in the country, whatever that means, but we still had 3 mass shootings in 3 days.
What Newsom was responding to was not even a question. He had just finished calling the Second Amendment a “suicide pact” when the reporter pointed out that many people in the U.S. support the Second Amendment.
This was Newsom’s swat-down reply:
“Yeah, I have great respect. I have no ideological opposition with someone reasonably and responsibly owning firearms and getting background checks and being trained and making sure they’re locked [up] so their kid doesn’t accidentally shoot themselves or a loved one. Absolutely not. Never suggested that. That’s what they immediately do. ‘He wants to take away your guns.’ I just want to take away weapons of war that are illegal on the streets of California and should be illegal across the United States.”
I think what he’s missing here is that two of the shootings were carried out with guns that are legal to own in California. Whether or not they were legally obtained I do not know, but I do know that only a small percentage of gun crimes are committed with legally obtained weapons.
The third shooter had a gun that is not legal to own in California. It was an old gun so he may have acquired it before it was banned or he may have bought it in another state.
But so what? The shooter is no longer alive but if he were, he’d be charged with what? — 11 counts of murder and one count of possessing an illegal firearm? That’s a deterrent?
Good luck reducing gun violence with more laws and more laws and more laws. It’s not going to work.
I saw this interview on the news. Not noted in the article cited above is that Newsom and the reporter were walking along a sidewalk, closely followed by Newsom’s bodyguards, all of whom it’s safe to assume were carrying guns.
It would be nice if modesty prevented me from saying that my household income is much higher than the median Indian household income.
A lot of you white people out there are pulling down the average.
Here's an alternative: We could consolidate government and corporate power to crush dissent. It worked for Mussolini! Well … for a while it did. https://t.co/n3MOYo7HLg
— Paul Epps (@paulepps) January 26, 2023
In what conceivable way are American citizens benefited or having their lives improved or increasingly secured by escalating the U.S. role in the war in Ukraine? Or conversely, in what conceivable way would your life or the lives of most Americans be harmed by changes in the governance of various provinces in Eastern Ukraine? How would your life be affected if the citizens of the Donbas region decided, as Kosovo decided 20 years ago, that they preferred to be independent or be governed by Moscow rather than by Kyiv? Why would that matter to your life? Why is the U.S. government willing to provoke so much danger to the globe, so much risk of escalation, and a practically direct proxy war now with the world’s largest nuclear power? Over what? Over who rules various provinces in eastern Ukraine.
‘I was too ambitious’: Spotify CEO announces layoffs among 6% of employees as tech job cuts continue — msn.com
Spotify CEO Daniel Ek said that the decision to restructure Spotify is an “effort to drive more efficiency, control costs, and speed up decision-making,” adding that he takes “full accountability for the moves that got us here today.”
I love it — and when I say I love it, I mean I don’t love it — when someone says they take “full accountability” for some disaster, knowing perfectly well that there won’t be any personal consequences.
There’s no accountability without consequences. Had he said “I’m forfeiting my salary for the year and donating it to the employees who lost their jobs,” now that’s something I could respect.
Popular Bookstores, Including Barnes & Noble, Are Closing Locations, Starting Feb. 11 — bestlifeonline.com
JCPenney Is Closing Even More Locations, Starting Next Month — bestlifeonline.com
JCPenney already filed for bankruptcy and closed 200 stores in 2020.
Another day, another round of layoffs and closures. That must mean it’s time for another sunshine up the butthole economic report from the Biden administration.
With unemployment at a record low and the two strongest years of job creation in our history, there are reasons for economic optimism all across our country.
— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) January 25, 2023
This reminds me of papers I wrote in high school and got them back with “Evidence?” scrawled all over them.
Any “job creation” news over the last two years should come with an asterisk, given that we lost 20 million jobs due to COVID shutdowns, so a large number of the jobs being “created” are jobs that we already had, then lost, then we got them back.
And creating jobs is easy, if all you want to do is put people to work. You can give them a job digging holes then filling them in again. The question to be answered is are we creating productive jobs.
I’m leaning toward an answer of no, given that CNBC says that 63 percent of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck (I’ve heard higher numbers but “paycheck to paycheck” is not a well-defined metric) and that many people have found that they can make more money from unemployment and other subsidies than they can from working.