Sometimes I get a song in my head and I have to walk around the house singing it:
I love rock ‘n’ roll
So put another dime in the jukebox, baby
“Why a jukebox?” my kid asks.
Sometimes I get a song in my head and I have to walk around the house singing it:
I love rock ‘n’ roll
So put another dime in the jukebox, baby
“Why a jukebox?” my kid asks.
It’s the first morning of summer vacation and my boy is on the computer loading up his iPod . . .
“And what might you be doing?” he says as I walk by.
“Getting ready for work,” I say.
“Oh yeah . . . work.”
I’m listening to some new music on my laptop, while my kid delivers a running critique . . .
“Boring,” he says. “Lame.”
“If you don’t like it, go somewhere else. Move along!”
“Critics don’t ‘move along,'” he says. “Critics have to criticize.”
Few Americans either behind or in front of our cameras give evidence of any recognition or respect for themselves or one another as human beings, or have any desire to be themselves or to let others be themselves. On both ends of the camera you find very few people who are not essentially, instead, just promoters, little racketeers, interested in ‘the angle.’
The West reveals here a hatred of itself, which is strange and can be only considered pathological; the West is laudably trying to open itself, full of understanding, to external values, but it no longer loves itself; in its own history, it now sees only what is deplorable and destructive, while it is no longer able to perceive what is great and pure.
A woman calls to her dog, a mutt named Lucky.
“Why did you name him Lucky?” I ask.
“He got hit by a car and survived,” she says.
Hmmm . . . it seems to me if he were really lucky, he wouldn’t have been hit by a car in the first place.
What was his name before he got hit by the car? Bullseye?
Wal-Mart heir John Walton died Monday when his ultralight aircraft crashed after taking off from an airport in Jackson, Wyoming.
We don’t have the money, so we have to think.
Ernest Rutherford was an illustrious scientist — the 1908 Nobel Laureate in Chemistry, and the father of nuclear physics.

His humble upbringing as the fourth in a family of 12 children in rural New Zealand influenced his approach to science, as summarized in the above quote.
A recruiter called me today about a job managing an $80 million IT project.
How in the world can you spend $80 million on an IT project?! I could put your company logo on Mars for $80 million.
Most of the big, expensive IT projects that I’m familiar with, there really was no reason for them to take so long or cost so much. A lot of time and money could have been saved with some upfront thinking.
I get a lot of this now — recruiters asking me if I have experience managing multi-year, multi-million dollar projects, as if there’s some competitive advantage to be had from spending huge sums of money over long periods of time.
A modern variation on Rutherford’s famous saying might be: “We’ve got 80 million dollars! Why should we have to think?!”
Thus spoke The Programmer.
A lie repeated often enough becomes truth.
As the GOP drifts further to the right, and becomes more starkly the party of the wealthy, it is gaining support among the working class.
I have never seen a wholly satisfactory explanation for this trend, which now spans two generations. . . . Republicans, of course, will argue that it’s simply the working man’s understanding that the GOP has the better argument, i.e., that the best way to help the working class is to shower the rich with tax breaks. But the Bush administration has been showering the rich with tax breaks for more than four years, and the working class has nothing to show for it.
Self-absorbed, self-aggrandizing BS, a.k.a. Steve Jobs’ commencement speech at Stanford, gets a good skewering . . .
ME: You’re a real wise guy.
HIM: You’re lamentable.
My son’s hockey team won the TORHS West Coast Conference championship. They got jerseys and a trophy.
I took some team and individual photos.
We’re having a fundraising event at the office today. Executives will race around the parking lot in office chairs. Wagering is permitted, with proceeds going to the United Way.
Here’s how I handicap it: The CFO is pretty fit and looks like a winner. On the other hand, the Sales VP is a Snidely Whiplash type who’s probably loosening the wheels on the other guys’ chairs as we speak, which makes him a dangerous guy to bet against.
No one else in the race looks remotely capable of winning any sort of athletic contest. It would be fun to run a side pool on which fat-ass will be the first to go down with a torn ACL or other crippling injury . . .
High-Tech Industry Employment Slowly Turns the Corner, Says New Report
I clicked that link, only to learn that while high-tech employment continued to decline in 2004, it did so at a lower rate than the two previous years.
Hence, the job market has turned the corner, if by “turned the corner” you mean “continued to disintegrate, but at a slower pace.”
Thus spoke The Programmer.
My son is doing a “generation gap” essay for school, in which he contrasts my life as an 11-year-old with his.
Pat Metheny was asked in a recent interview what advice he would give to younger musicians:
I have one kind of stock response that I use, which I feel is really good. And it’s ‘always be the worst guy in every band you’re in.’ If you’re the best guy there, you need to be in a different band. And I think that works for almost everything that’s out there as well.
George Murray, a poet and co-editor of the literary blog Bookninja.com, sees the near-annual release of a new Stephen King novel as ‘the literary equivalent of watching a skinny Japanese dude scarf down 100 hot dogs in an eating contest; you are kind of grossed out, but gotta hand it to him.’ Murray harbors a unique theory about what distinguishes a genre writer like King from a so-called serious artist like Joyce Carol Oates. ‘It seems with Oates the hotdog eater is a performance artist commenting on the nature of consumption and American hegemony,’ Murray avers. ‘With King it’s just a guy eating 100 hot dogs, then looking like he’s going to die of nitrate poisoning.’
A family member had surgery recently and had to sign a consent form:
I have been advised that all surgery involves general risks, including but not limited to bleeding, infection, nerve or tissue damage and rarely, cardiac arrest, death or other serious bodily injury. I acknowledge that no guarantees or assurances have been made as to the results that may be obtained.
And so on . . . Don’t say you weren’t warned!
Medical professionals are very good at setting realistic expectations with the customer, whereas in IT we take customers into projects with glib assurances and wishful thinking.
I wonder if we could make a practice of saying to customers even something as simple as this:
“This project — like all projects — has a number of possible outcomes, and not all of them are good. Let’s go over some of the more likely scenarios . . .”
Thus spoke The Programmer.
Fitzgerald had to kill off his own famous striver because, to the author, Gatsby represented a dying American dream based on making it the hard way. But no such grim fate awaits today’s little Gatsbys. When they peer out at the universe, they don’t see a green dock light blinking from an unbridgeable distance where the Establishment folk live. This is the age of the red camera light, where everyone arrives sooner or later, if only for a moment, and nobody ever dies of ambition or shame.