The author is chasing his tail in so many different directions that it’s hard to respond. You should not write a looong post on “misinformation” without defining “misinformation.” For example, during COVID, a NY Times reporter said that getting a COVID vaccine doesn’t prevent you from getting or spreading COVID. Our government labeled that as “misinformation” and coerced tech companies to ban the reporter from social media. Of course, now we know that statement to be true. I could go through more examples but the point is that labeling something as “misinformation” is arbitrary. Pending a definition, I’ll say that “misinformation” generally means “something I don’t want you to read or hear” and is protected speech. The author mentions hate speech. Hate speech is protected speech. Supreme Court precedent is very clear on this. The author mentions fraud. Fraud is the intentional act of deceiving someone to gain a benefit.… Read more →