Would you bet your paycheck on a weather forecast for tomorrow? If not, then why should this country bet billions on “global warming” predictions that have even less foundation?
— Thomas Sowell (@ThomasSowell) September 5, 2019
What is the goal of background checks? To prevent murders? The Odessa shooter, to cite one example, couldn’t pass a background check, but he got his hands on a gun anyway.
If you’re trying to get a gun for the purpose of murdering one or more persons, why would you care about passing a background check?
Has anyone ever said “I was planning to go on a murderous rampage but I didn’t want to do it with an illegally obtained firearm. Because I might get in trouble with the law.”
So for Odessa, charges would include seven deaths, 19 wounded, plus illegal possession of a firearm?! Is that a deterrent?
McDonald’s employee filmed choking, punching customer over alleged complaint about cold friesFOX 11 Los Angeles
How I would phrase that on my resume:
- Acted promptly to resolve customer complaints.
Trump administration readies ban on flavored e-cigarettes amid outbreak of vaping-related deathsCNBC
Condolences to the victims but do six deaths in a country of 320 million people really represent an “outbreak”?
Also, “vaping-related deaths” is bullshit as the article itself says in the first paragraph:
The Trump administration is preparing to ban flavored e-cigarettes as federal health officials call for restrictions to combat an outbreak of a mysterious lung disease . . .
“Mysterious lung disease.” In the headline, vaping is flat-out killing people; in the article it’s a mystery disease.
I’ve read specifically about three of the deaths. One was here in Southern California, in Los Angeles County. The deceased was described as an older adult male, at least 55 years old, with chronic health conditions.
A woman who died in Kansas was older than 50 and had a history of health problems.
In Minnesota, the state’s “first known vaping-related death” was a person over 65 years with a history of lung problems.
The pattern seems to be that a not-young person in poor health dies and the death is attributed to vaping.
It’s not possible. It’s not possible to say what caused an illness in one particular person.
A heavy smoker gets lung cancer. Did smoking cause the lung cancer? There’s no way to know that. Because non-smokers also get lung cancer.
Not as often as smokers but they do. We can look at a population and say that smoking strongly correlates with lung cancer, but for one person, there is no way to know.
Symptoms of the “mysterious lung disease” include shortness of breath, fatigue, chest pain and vomiting., all of which existed before the invention of vaping and have a long list of potential causes.
In other news . . .
Mysterious illness kills dozens of dogs in Norway with otherwise-healthy pets dropping dead in days after suffering bloody vomit and diarrhoeaDaily Mail
Had the dogs been vaping?
The “problem” being addressed is that white and Asian students dominate the selective programs, leaving black and Hispanic students in highly segregated schools, so instead of figuring out how to bring underachievers up to the mark, let’s eliminate the programs.
Critics of the plan worry that middle class (i.e., white and Asian) parents will either move out of the city or send their kids to private school, making the New York schools even more segregated than they are now.
An NYU professor weighs in to say that many parents in cities like New York value diversity and want to send their children to schools that serve everyone.
“Many parents” = the parents of the dumb kids. Nobody else gives a shit about “diversity.” I assure you that most of the white parents and 99 percent of the Asian parents have never been heard to say “I want my children to get the best possible education, but not at the expense of diversity.”
(I don’t think the black and Hispanic parents give a shit about about diversity either except as a lever to improve the schools that their kids go to.)
Government takes away far too much money and freedom, often simultaneously. I’d like to have the freedom to take my skills to the marketplace, earn a dollar and spend it any way I want to.
Politicians say no, we’re taking that dollar because we know how to spend your money better than you do.
I’m resigned on this point. But when politicians say “we know how to raise your kids better than you do”?!
The arrogance! It’s tyranny. And it’s tyranny with a clear conscience because the tyrants truly believe that they know the best interests of the tyrannized.
It;s your lucky day! Your kids are going to be part of some grand social experiment to set up classrooms like checkerboards, and no, we don’t have any data on the educational merits.
Our children are our hope for the future. I’ll move out of the district, I’ll move out of the fucking country before letting elected officials tell me what kind of education my kids can and cannot have.
Now therefore thus saith the Lord of hosts; Consider your ways.
Ye have sown much, and bring in little; ye eat, but ye have not enough; ye drink, but ye are not filled with drink; ye clothe you, but there is none warm; and he that earneth wages earneth wages to put it into a bag with holes.
Thus saith the Lord of hosts; Consider your ways.Haggai 1:5-7
Trump went golfing as Hurricane Dorian threatens USCNN
So what? I was jerking off while my dad died of a heart attack.
No, I made that up. The point is, life goes on. Did you stop fucking your secretary just because your sister was in the hospital? Of course not. There was nothing you could do for her, just like there’s nothing Trump can do about the hurricane.
Give me a fucking break . . .
Texas state lawmaker calls for ‘praying for protection’ instead of gun reform in wake of mass shootingCNN
Let me ask you: what is “gun reform”? Why would it be better than prayer for preventing mass shootings?
Pray for protection and if you get shot, take comfort in knowing it was God’s will.
Can I get an amen?
Before swinging a refrigerator door shut over the top of your bare foot, make sure the door has enough clearance to actually go over the top of your foot.
You don’t know his name, but you know who he is. He’s one of three people in the foreground of one of the most famous photos in American history.
Leavelle is the man in the light-colored suit escorting Lee Harvey Oswald through the basement of Dallas Police Headquarters when Oswald was shot by Jack Ruby.
Notice the difference in the position of Oswald relative to Leavelle in the photo below, before the gunshot. Leavelle, who was handcuffed to Oswald, said when he saw Ruby with the gun, he tried to jerk Oswald behind him, but Ruby was so close by that time that all he was able to do was turn Oswald sideways.
RIP Jim Leavelle
“Does that complete your order?”
“Would you like some chips or guacamole with that?”
“What did I just say?”
Axios (whatever that is) sat back and said GEEEEE, let’s see, what can we make up today to embarrass the President? Then they said, “why don’t we say he wants to bomb a hurricane, that should do it!” The media in our Country is totally out of control!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 27, 2019
- I haven’t seen any evidence that the president suggested bombing hurricanes, but . . .
- The idea of bombing hurricanes is not new. According to National Geographic, “on October 11, 1961, the head of the U.S. Weather Bureau said he could ‘imagine the possibility someday of exploding a nuclear bomb on a hurricane far at sea.'”
- The habit of saying seemingly crazy ideas out loud is something, I think, to be encouraged. Ideas that must have seemed insane the first time someone said them out loud would include “Let’s put a man on the moon,” “Let’s dig a canal across the continent,” etc.
I asked Google for directions to CVS at Harvard Place, which is a local shopping area here in Irvine.
Google provided directions to Cambridge, MA.
The good news is that traffic is light so I should arrive in just under 48 hours.
Trump distorted science in seeking to assign blame on video games for the deadly shootings in Texas and Ohio, rather than on his own words that critics say contributed to a combustible racial climate spawning violence.
Trump said one thing while his critics said another? That’s a fact check?!
First of all, “I blame video games” is a ridiculous simplification of what he actually said but okay, let’s talk about video games . . .
I’m not aware of a “scientific link” between video games and mass shootings. Nor am I aware of a “scientific link” between Trump talking about immigration and mass shootings, but notice that doesn’t stop the AP from throwing it out there.
(“Critics say” does not establish a scientific link.)
How is the video game research done? Do researchers look at the percentage of video game players who commit mass murder and say “Well, it’s virtually zero, thus no connection.”
Mass murder is thankfully an extremely rare event. It’s indicative of nothing to say that almost no one who does X commits mass murder.
I would be interested though, once someone has committed a mass murder, in knowing what their video game habits were. I know in at least one recent case — the Christchurch shootings — the killer live streamed it like a first person shooter video game. Where would he get an idea like that?
Regarding words contributing to a “combustible racial climate spawning violence,” a lot of Americans over the last few years have taken to calling everyone politically to the right of themselves racists, white supremacists and Nazis.
What do those words contribute to?
- Tolerance, inclusion and mutual respect
- A “combustible racial climate spawning violence”
The correct answer is B.
Trump says there’s an “invasion” at the border and he’s creating a “combustible racial climate spawning violence.” Meanwhile, the Associated Press and most every other news organization give their blessing to half the country being insulted on a daily basis with fighting words like “racist,” “Nazi” and “white supremacist,” apparently without considering that anyone might be getting pretty pissed off about it.
This picture is actually from the CNN website, in case you’re thinking I cherry-picked an image to make Anderson Cooper look like a clown . . .
Arresting some knucklehead on a weapons charge and saying you “thwarted a mass shooting” is a speculative fantasy.
For example, four of the shootings occurred in Chicago, where in each case the shooters fired into a crowd of people. By my count, about half the victims were women.
I can’t find any reporting on this in Mother Jones, which is pretty shocking given their obvious interest in mass shootings.
They’d rather report on imaginary mass shootings by white males than on the actual mass shootings of Chicago residents .
The Mass Shooting Tracker defines a mass shooting as “an incident where four or more people are shot in a single shooting spree.”
The FBI definition of “mass murder” is three or more people murdered in one event. The FBI doesn’t have a definition for “mass shooting.” You have to actually die for the FBI to take notice of you.
As of this writing, of 75 mass shootings in 2019, where the race of the perpetrator is known, 22 were white, 39 were black, 8 were Latino, 3 were Asian, 2 were American Indian and 1 was Arab.
Many of the 2019 mass shootings are currently unsolved, thus the race of the shooters is not known, but they often took place in black areas and claimed black victims.
Mass shootings of black citizens is not generally considered newsworthy, possibly because media have written inner cities off as unsalvageable, so what happens there is of no interest; or possibly because these cases don’t fit the preferred narrative of mass shootings being the exclusive province of white males.
El Paso is the worst mass murder (22 deaths) in the U.S. in 2019. Second worst: DeWayne Craddock, a black man, murdered 13 co-workers in Virginia Beach, VA. Relatively speaking, how much more coverage did El Paso get? Ten times as much? 100 times? I know it was a lot.
El Paso fits a narrative; Virginia Beach doesn’t.
Because this crime hits not one but two media hot buttons — gun violence and homophobia — if not for the fact that Robinson is not white, it should have been a national topic for weeks, and then been adapted into a movie, a play and a miniseries.
As it is, you’ve probably never heard of Deroy Robinson.
TL;DR: Mass shootings happen every day but they largely go unreported. With more than four months left in 2019, there have already been 320 mass shootings (per Mass Shooting Tracker). White males are not the only perpetrators, and in fact are are not even close to being the majority of perpetrators.
Even in cases of actual mass murder, as in the Craddock and Robinson cases, the volume of news coverage seems to be much lower for non-white shooters.
Slate has published a transcript of what it calls the New York Times “crisis town-hall meeting.”
The transcript shows that Times executive editor Dean Baquet seems to fault readers for their failure to understand the Times and its duties in the era of Trump. “They sometimes want us to pretend that he was not elected president, but he was elected president,” Baquet said. “And our job is to figure out why, and how, and to hold the administration to account. If you’re independent, that’s what you do.”
This was followed by 75 minutes of Q&A with staffers in which, by my count, every question except one could be summarized as “Why can’t we call Donald Trump a racist more often?”
In terms of figuring out why and how Trump was elected, I feel sure that “Can you believe what stupid racists Republican voters are?” moves us further from rather than closer to an answer.
It also says a lot about about the so-called “independence” of the New York Times.
Here is what Baquet said about the Times coverage of the Russian collusion (non-)story:
“Chapter 1 of the story of Donald Trump, not only for our newsroom but, frankly, for our readers, was: Did Donald Trump have untoward relationships with the Russians, and was there obstruction of justice? . . .
“The day Bob Mueller walked off that witness stand, two things happened. Our readers who want Donald Trump to go away suddenly thought, “Holy shit, Bob Mueller is not going to do it.” And Donald Trump got a little emboldened politically, I think. Because, you know, for obvious reasons. And I think that the story changed. A lot of the stuff we’re talking about started to emerge like six or seven weeks ago. We’re a little tiny bit flat-footed. I mean, that’s what happens when a story looks a certain way for two years. Right?”
No, that’s not right. “A little tiny bit flat-footed”? The story “looked” a certain way for two years because you pre-selected it as the number one narrative of the Trump presidency and because you deliberately framed it a certain way for two years, and that way was, in a word, wrong.