And That’s the Truth: Sidney Poitier

Sojourner Truth

[And That’s the Truth is a feature by our guest blogger, Sojourner Truth — PE]

God he was a handsome man. I seen that he died. He was described as a “legendary actor and civil rights activist.”

Black folks got to get over the notion that all they problems are caused by other people.

Nobody likes Jews but Jews done very well for theyselves. We had a Jewish man, Bernie Sanders, run for president two times and I never once heard him even mention that he was Jewish or that you was a Jew-hater if you disagreed with him. A black person run for some office, everything about race. You can’t disagree on the merits, you can only disagree because you a racist.

I would like to hear someone explain Asian success to me in the context of white supremacy. America has always treated Asians very badly . . . it’s not so well known, but it’s true.

Maybe there’s a Asian civil rights activist but if there is, I couldn’t name one.

In my lifetime, racism was a real thing. Racism is dead in America, almost . . . the only thing keepin it alive is “civil rights activists” and people who feel better about themselfs by callin someone else a “racist.”

And that’s the Truth!

Has Religion Made Useful Contributions to Civilization?


My own view on religion is that of Lucretius. I regard it as a disease born of fear and as a source of untold misery to the human race. I cannot, however, deny that it has made some contributions to civilization. It helped in early days to fix the calendar, and it caused Egyptian priests to chronicle eclipses with such care that in time they became able to predict them. These two services I am prepared to acknowledge, but I do not know of any others.

— Bertrand Russell, “Has Religion Made Useful Contributions to Civilization?”

Wailing and Gnashing of Teeth


Then Christ says, “The Son of Man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of His kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity, and shall cast them into a furnace of fire; there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth,” and he goes on about the wailing and gnashing of teeth. It comes in one verse after another, and it is quite manifest to the reader that there is a certain pleasure in contemplating wailing and gnashing of teeth, or else it would not occur so often. . . . I must say that I think all this doctrine, that hell-fire is a punishment for sin, is a doctrine of cruelty. It is a doctrine that put cruelty into the world and gave the world generations of cruel torture, and the Christ of the Gospels, if you could take Him as his chroniclers represent Him, would certainly have to be considered partly responsible for that.

— Bertrand Russell, “Why I Am Not a Christian”

Could Right and Wrong Exist Without God?


Kant, as I say, invented a new moral argument for the existence of God . . . One form is to say that there would be no right or wrong unless God existed. I am not for the moment concerned with whether there is a difference between right and wrong, or whether there is not: that is another question. The point I am concerned with is that, if you are quite sure there is a difference between right and wrong, you are in this situation: Is that difference due to God’s fiat or is it not? If it is due to God’s fiat, then for God himself there is no difference between right and wrong, and it is no longer a significant statement to say that God is good. If you are going to say, as theologians do, that God is good, you must then say that right and wrong have some meaning which is independent of God’s fiat, because God’s fiats are good and not bad independently of the mere fact that he made them. If you are going to say that, you will then have to say that it is not only through God that right and wrong came into being but that they are in their essence logically anterior to God.

— Bertrand Russell, “Why I Am Not a Christian”

If we were not afraid of death, I do not believe the idea of immortality would ever have arisen. — Bertrand Russell

Chess Game of the Day: French Defense


One of my online chess games. Black builds a probably winning advantage but is running short on time (in a 3+2 blitz game). I offered a draw, which Black declined. This was followed by some not-so-good moves on both sides, including a losing blunder by Black on the last move. Some annotations below . . .

1. …e6 French Defense

39. Qa5? Black has probably a winning advantage and it’s hard to find a strong move.

39. …Ba6+? Black could start to capitalize on the pawn advantage with 39. …c4.

41. Qa1? I didn’t see it coming but 41. Kh2 would have avoided the upcoming knight sacrifice on g3, which opens up the diagonal to the White king. Black is winning but has only 21 seconds left (I have 43) so I offered a draw, which Black declined.

42. Qa4? 42. Qc3 would have guarded g3. It’s too late for 42. Kh2 because of 42. …c4.

42. …Nxg3!

45. b4! Believe it or not, I think this is better than saving the knight with 45. Nf3 because after 45. …c2, I can’t see a line that isn’t a disaster for White. This at least removes the immediate threat of Black queening the c-pawn.

46. …g6?? Black could safely tuck the king away at g8 instead of offering a target at g6.

47. Qxd2? I should have hit g6 right away with 47. h5.

47. …Bc4?? This seems like a real nothing move compared to 47. …d4, opening the diagonal to the White king.

48. h5?? It’s too late for this. With the White queen off the white diagonal, Black can defuse the attack with 48. …g5. 48. Nh3 has more possibilities for White.

48. …Kg7??

50. …d4?? Giving away pieces is not the best strategy in this situation. Black has completely squandered the advantage but it’s still an even game after 50. …Kf8. Black loses the g-pawn, so material is even, and both kings are completely vulnerable. Unfortunately, he has only 4 seconds left on his clock (I have 28) and lets it run out.

Whence Then is Evil?


EPICURUS’s old questions are yet unanswered. Is [God] willing to prevent evil, but not able? then is he impotent. Is he able, but not willing? then is he malevolent. Is he both able and willing? whence then is evil?

— David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

Can Religion Cure Our Troubles?


I do not myself think that the dependence of morals upon religion is nearly as close as religious people believe it to be. I even think that some very important virtues are more likely to be found among those who reject religious dogmas than among those who accept them. I think this applies especially to the virtue of truthfulness or intellectual integrity. I mean by intellectual integrity the habit of deciding vexed questions in accordance with the evidence, or of leaving them undecided where the evidence is inconclusive. This virtue, although it is underestimated by almost all adherents of any system of dogma, is to my mind of the very greatest social importance and far more likely to benefit the world than Christianity or any other system of organized beliefs.

— Bertrand Russell, “Can Religion Cure Our Troubles?”

Djokovic is Not Your Big Problem, Mate


Thirty days ago, Australia had reported a total of 247,000 COVID cases. As of today, the case count has risen to 1.8 million.

And they think their biggest problem is Novak Djokovic?!

Note that Djokovic was not even deported for public health reasons. He’s had a positive COVID test, followed by a negative COVID test, and everyone agreed he was safe via natural immunity.

He was deported because as some point in the past, he expressed skepticism about vaccines and to have him in Australia, well, he might influence others in the country to become skeptical about vaccines.

I’d say what’s more likely to cause Australians to become skeptical about vaccines is the fact that COVID is spiraling out of control while 80 percent of their population is fully vaccinated.

More Words and Phrases I’m Sick Unto Death Of: “Science”


Here’s a meme finding its way around the internet:

If you are not a scientist, and you disagree with scientists about science, it’s actually not a disagreement. You’re just wrong. Science is not truth. Science is finding the truth. When science changes its opinion, it didn’t lie to you. It learned more.

That is one of the stupidest things I’ve ever had the displeasure of reading.

  1. “Science” doesn’t have an opinion. Scientists have opinions but they often differ.
  2. When a scientist disagrees with another scientist, which one is wrong?
  3. If science is not truth, why is it wrong to disagree?
  4. If “science” can change its opinion, then everyone who previously held the new opinion was right, and “science” was wrong.

Why must people who know nothing about science attempt to give science lessons to the rest of us like we’re all morons?

OK, I know the answer. It’s this COVID thing. For people who share his views, Dr. Anthony Fauci IS “science” and anything he doesn’t like is “misinformation.” But for the record, there are scientists who believe the Fauci strategy to be misguided for one or more reasons. And it would be hard to make an evidence-based case that the strategy has been a great success.

2021: The Year in Books


These are the books I read in 2021, roughly in the order listed. The ratings are mine. They don’t represent a consensus of opinion.

Books of the Year: All Quiet on the Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque (fiction), Zeroville by Steve Erickson (contemporary fiction) and Why I Am Not a Christian and Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects by Bertrand Russell (non-fiction).

Is It Humane to Believe in Everlasting Punishment?


I do not myself feel that any person who is really profoundly humane can believe in everlasting punishment. Christ certainly as depicted in the Gospels did believe in everlasting punishment, and one does find repeatedly a vindictive fury against those who would not listen to His preaching — an attitude which is not uncommon with preachers, but which does somewhat detract from superlative excellence. You do not, for instance find that attitude in Socrates. You find him quite bland and urbane toward the people who would not listen to him; and it is, to my mind, far more worthy of a sage to take that line than to the the line of indignation. You probably all remember the sort of things that Socrates was saying as he was dying, and the sort of things that he generally did say to people who did not agree with him.

You will find that in the Gospels Christ said, “Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell.” That was said to people who did not like his preaching. It is not really to my mind the best tone, and there are a great many of these things about hell.

— Bertrand Russell, “Why I Am Not a Christian”

What to Do in a Tsunami


The good news is that on the water side of Ocean Blvd in Santa Monica there is about a 100-ft high bluff, which should be a good tsunami barrier. But a good way to go out would be sitting on the restaurant deck at the end of the pier (in the middle distance below) with a refreshing cocktail and speaking my final words just prior to being crushed by a wall of water: “See you in Hell!” Record the whole thing as a live TikTok. If that doesn’t go viral, I don’t know what will.

Santa Monica

Chess Game of the Day: Italian Game Sudden Death


One of my online chess games. Some annotations below . . .

3. Bc4 Italian Game

3. …Nf6 Two Knights Defense

5. …Na5 Polerio Defense

6. Bb5+ Bishop Check Line

8. …Qd5?! More speculative than 8. …Nd5

15. Qf2? I thought White had the advantage had he played 15. Nh3, blocking the Black rook from pinning the White h-pawn.

17. Re2?? White has a playable position by covering the rook with 17. Kg1 (probably best) or one of several knight moves, but any effort at saving the rook by moving it results in . . .

17. …Ng3#

What Really Moves People to Believe in God


What really moves people to believe in God is not any intellectual argument at all. Most people believe in God because they have been taught to do so from early infancy to do it, and that is the main reason.

Then I think that the next most powerful reason is the wish for safety, a sort of feeling thath there is a big brother who will look after you. That plays a very profound part in influencing people’s desire for a belief in God.

— Bertrand Russell, “Why I Am Not a Christian”

There Has Been a Rumor


There has been a rumor in recent years to the effect that I have become less opposed to religious orthodoxy than I formerly was. This rumor is totally without foundation. I think all the great religions of the world — Buddhism, Hinduism, Christianity, Islam, and Communism — both untrue and harmful.

— Bertrand Russell, 1957

We are all faced with a series of great opportunities brilliantly disguised as impossible situations. — Charles Swindoll

More Words and Phrases I’m Sick Unto Death Of: “Insurrection”


What is an “insurrection”? I guess I could look it up. Is it a crime? Have any of the arrested protestors been charged with that? If not, why do we keep saying it? Is an insurrection bad by definition? Was the Revolutionary War an insurrection?

This Day in History: January 6


On Jan. 6, 2021, a group of unarmed citizens frustrated by their inability to date Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez walked into a building.

This Day in History: Aretha Franklin

Aretha Franklin

On Jan. 3, 1987, Aretha Franklin became the first (biological) woman inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

This may be an opportunity for someone inducted before 1987 to put on a dress and say “Wait a minute, I identify as a woman” and knock Aretha out of the history books.

It worked for Amy Schneider.